Dams

D+

Summary

There are more than 92,000 dams in the U.S. that generate electricity, supply drinking water, and protect communities and critical infrastructure. Nearly 17,000 of these dams are considered high hazard potential, meaning there is likelihood of deadly harm to residents and property in the case of a dam failure. The cost of maintaining, upgrading, and repairing these structures has increased significantly since the beginning of the 21st century because of an increase in extreme weather events, growing populations downstream, and the outdated design challenges of aging structures. The average age of our nation’s dams is over 60 years, while 7 of 10 dams nationwide are expected to reach 50 years by 2025. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) provided approximately $3 billion to improve dam safety, although Congress redirected $364 million of that funding for other purposes. Furthermore, federal dam safety programs continue to receive annual appropriations below their authorized funding levels. Despite these challenges, IIJA funding, combined with other Congressional actions, provided a needed boost to overall dam safety and rehabilitation. However, without a more significant commitment to dam safety through increased annual investment in inspection, monitoring, planning, and necessary dam repairs, the cost to bring the nation’s dams into a state of good repair will continue to rise and downstream communities will face a greater risk of danger from potential dam failure.

Explore Background
Highlights

7 out of 10 dams in the U.S.

are more than 50 years old and therefore are often not designed to withstand

increasingly heavy and frequent rain events

The cost to repair

the nation's non-federal dams

is over $165 billion.

On average, a single state dam safety official

can be responsible for overseeing

190 existing dams and the construction of new dams

Condition & Capacity

Dams are classified by their hazard potential, or the risk posed to downstream communities in the event of a dam failure. In the U.S., more than 16,700 dams are classified as high hazard potential as of August 2024, which means that if one of these dams should fail, the likely result would be loss of life and significant destruction to property. While such a classification highlights risk to communities, hazard potential does not indicate a dam’s condition. Approximately 15%, or more than 2,500, of the nation’s high hazard–potential dams are assessed to be in poor or unsatisfactory condition. While a dam’s hazard potential can often be determined by factors such as downstream development, condition assessments are primarily affected by the relative age of the structure, updated science and techniques for evaluating conditions, weather events, and climate change. High hazard–potential dams nationwide have increased by 20% since 2012, driven mostly by increased development in downstream areas.

Explore Condition & Capacity

Funding & Future Need

The National Dam Safety Program (NDSP) is the primary source of federal funding for states to improve their dam safety programs that support activities such as inspection and monitoring, emergency preparedness, and staffing needs. This program is only authorized to receive $13.9 million annually. The High Hazard Potential Dam Rehabilitation Grant Program (HHPD) Grant Program, which provides competitive grants to states to support repairs for dams posing the greatest risk to downstream communities, is authorized at $60 million annually. In 2021, the IIJA provided a total of $800 million for these programs as a one-time injection of much-needed support for dam safety. Furthermore, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Water Infrastructure Financing Program (CWIFP), which supports non-federal dam safety projects through low-interest loans, received $75 million under IIJA. Meanwhile, the Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service administers a dam rehabilitation grant program through its Small Watershed Program, which receives about $10 million annually and $118 million in additional funds through IIJA.

Explore Funding & Future Need

Operation & Maintenance

Nearly every state has a fully operational dam safety program. These programs allow states to receive federal funds to perform necessary dam safety operation and maintenance activities such as developing emergency action plans (EAPs), conducting public outreach, and undertaking regular dam inspection and monitoring. Until recently, Alabama was the only state that did not have a state dam safety program. However, in 2023 and 2024, Alabama took legislative action to create an opt-in dam safety program, allowing for inspection and monitoring of state-owned and privately owned dams. These initiatives move the state closer to eligibility for NDSP State Assistance Grants. State dam safety programs are eligible to receive state assistance grants if they meet certain criteria, including authority to require inspection of all dams to for risk every five years.

Explore Operation & Maintenance

Public Safety

Dam failures can pose significant challenges to impacted communities. In addition to causing billions of dollars in economic losses and the potential loss of life, dam failures can result in damage to interconnected infrastructure systems. Flooding from dam failures can impact bridges and roadways, threaten drinking water supplies, place excessive strain on stormwater infrastructure, and damage levee systems that protect floodplains. Emergency action plans are critical to minimizing damage caused by a dam failure. EAPs identify potential emergency conditions at a dam, specify preplanned actions to reduce property damage and loss of life should those conditions occur, and are initiated in the event of an impending dam failure or other uncontrolled release of water. In May 2020, the Edenville Dam in Michigan failed after significant rainfall. It was later determined that an exercise as part of the dam’s EAP was critical to informing evacuation plans, which led to “well-organized and orderly” evacuations of downstream communities.15 As a result, there were no reported casualties. As of 2024, more than 11,000 state-regulated high hazard–potential dams (nearly 82% of state-regulated high hazard dams, about equal to 2021) have an EAP.

Explore Public Safety

Resilience & Innovation

Worsening rainfall patterns and flooding increasingly strain the structural integrity of the nation’s dams. Heavy rainfall contributed to the failure of the Rapidan Dam in Minnesota in 2024, the Edenville Dam in Michigan in 2020, and the Oroville Dam’s flood control outlet spillways in 2017. The intensity and frequency of extreme precipitation and flooding are projected to continue increasing in several regions. Further, in many areas (e.g., West, Northwest, the New Madrid zone), non-climatic hazards like earthquakes compound the risk posed by climatic extremes to the nation’s dams.

Explore Resilience & Innovation

Raising the Grade

Solutions that Work

Carefully examine key benefits and trade-offs of dam removal and set practical goals for environmental recovery after removal, ensure effective data sharing from removal projects, and emphasize public engagement and cooperation throughout the removal process to balance public safety with environmental concerns.
Encourage improved land use planning at the local level so that communication about how dams affect local areas is more accurately known and considered in future planning.
Modernize methods of estimating probable maximum precipitation, as laid out in the 2024 report from the National Academies, to better determine the effects of extreme shifts in rainfall patterns, leading to better data for the engineering community to use in dam design and development of resiliency measures.
Complete implementation of a National Low-Head Dam Inventory by 2030, as authorized and prescribed in the Water Resources Development Acts of 2022 and 2024.
Continue to build on progress by ensuring that all high hazard–potential dams have an emergency action plan by 2030.
Fully fund the National Dam Safety Program and High Hazard Potential Dam Rehabilitation Grant Program, ensuring that adequate federal funds can support state dam safety programs and repairs to dams most in need and that pose the most significant risk to communities.

View Report Sources

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, “National Inventory of Dams,” 2024.
  • Association of State Dam Safety Officials, “The Cost of Rehabilitating Dams in the U.S.: A Methodology and Estimate,” 2023.
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, “National Inventory of Dams,” 2024.
  •  Association of State Dam Safety Officials, “The Cost of Rehabilitating Dams in the U.S.: A Methodology and Estimate,” 2023.
  • VTDigger, “Last Year’s Flooding Caused ‘Close Calls’ for Vermont Dams. Officials Are Trying to Make Sure it Doesn’t Happen Again,” 2024.
  • U.S. Global Change Research Program, “Fifth National Climate Assessment: 24. Midwest,” 2023.
  • Associated Press, “What Happened to Minnesota’s Rapidan Dam? Here’s What to Know About Its Flooding and Partial Failure,” June 26, 2024.
  • Association of State Dam Safety Officials, “The Cost of Rehabilitating Dams in the U.S.: A Methodology and Estimate,” 2023.
  • Los Angeles Times, “Oroville Dam Repair Costs Soar Past $1 Billion,” September 5, 2018.
  • Association of State Dam Safety Officials, “Roadmap to Reducing Dam Safety Risks,” 2024.
  • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, “Final Report: Investigation of Failures of Edenville and Sanford Dams,” 2022.
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, “National Inventory of Dams,” 2024.
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, “Modernizing Probable Maximum Precipitation,” 2024.
  • Congressional Research Service, “Dam Safety Overview and the Federal Role,” 2023.
  • Congressional Research Service, “Dam Safety Overview and the Federal Role,” 2023.
  • National Hydropower Association, Powerhouse, “Are Drones the Future of Dam Safety?,” 2022.
  • Iowa Outdoors, “Letting Rivers Run,” Spring 2022.
  • Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability, “Are We Ready for More Dam Removals in the United States?,” 2021.

Photo Attributions

  • Harrison Keely
  • Matthew T. Rader
  • OK Jaguar
  • P Hughes
  • Michelle Hayman
  • Gordon Chaffin
  • Tory Keeter
Sign Up for Email Updates

Sign Up For Email Updates

Select your home state, and we'll let you know about upcoming legislation.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is hidden when viewing the form
Are you a current ASCE member?*
By clicking here, you are agreeing to receive our quarterly newsletter.*

Back